Like, desire, while the inhibition out of view out of romantic choice

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. Bliv pГҐ hjemmesiden C. (2008). Progression and you may Human Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place of attachment in the individual mating. Report about General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Record regarding Social Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal tech one minimizes personal wedding and you can mental well-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.M., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, time, and time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent Society Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study regarding intimacy, interests, and you can commitment: Testing the fresh new assumptions of one’s triangular principle out of like. Mental Account, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impression most readily useful from the doing bad: Social comparisons inside intimate dating. Log away from Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit cognition of close competition. Diary of Identity and you may Societal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

Good. (2001)mitment and you will matchmaking fix components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you glamorous selection: The evolved mindset away from matchmaking repairs. Evolution and you can Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis away from disagreement and you will agreement inside troubled and you may nondistressed marital lovers. Log regarding Contacting and Logical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Green, A good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation online: What is the large destination? Journal away from Public Things, 58(1), 9–29.

The key benefits of positive illusions: Idealization as well as the build of satisfaction inside the romantic relationships

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-analysis aim within the close matchmaking: A type of global enhancement and you will certain confirmation. During the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents on the examination of couple telecommunications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge School Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-therapist thread through the lens from accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Theory, Lookup, Practice, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New personal overseeing program: Improved awareness to personal signs due to the fact a transformative a reaction to public exception. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new societal outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Drive.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the globe and particular relational habits regarding the experience of personal affairs. Diary out-of Identity and Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will guidance trying to into the romantic matchmaking. Personality and you will Social Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may particular attachment representations in the adulthood: Will there be a romance?. Diary Out-of Social And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate intimate relationship: Repair and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection yourself perception certainly one of partners given that a function of the newest resemblance within their common enjoy. Identity And you can Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Results of salience out-of extrinsic perks on the preference and you may enjoying. Journal of Character and you may Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.