Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties certainly one of spouse identification feature similarity, matchmaking onset, relationship quality, and you can love. [ Links ]
Baxter, L. A good., & West, L. (2003). Couples thinking of its parallels and variations: A good dialectical perspective. Log regarding Private and you will Societal Relationships, 20, 491-514. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you may feeling. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible matchmaking (pp. 143-161). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Bodily appeal and you may relationships alternatives: A test of your own complimentary theory. Journal out-of Fresh Social Therapy, 7, 173-189. [ Backlinks ]
Diary from Public and private Matchmaking, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Age., & Regan, P. (2005). The fresh new therapy regarding social relationships. Higher Saddle Lake, NJ: Pearson Training (Prentice Hall). [ Hyperlinks ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity overall performance and you can attributional communications once the determinants from social destination. Address Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and you may close relationship. When you look at the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The latest handbook of public therapy (Vol. 2, last ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Slope. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Will get eleven). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). You.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Backlinks ]
Buss, D. Meters. (1984). Relationship assortment getting identity dispositions: Research having around three some other study offer. Choices Genes, fourteen, 111-123. [ Website links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude regarding negative and positive reinforcements since the a determinant out-of destination. Diary out-of Identity and Social Therapy, dos, 884-889. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), For modern-big date Cupids, analysis replaces dating: Mental research was trailing the profitable fits generated at eHarmony. Association having Mental Science Observer, 18. Downloaded out-of [ Links ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. Grams. (2009). Boosting partner selection over the internet: A comparison out of dating top quality ranging from marriage ceremonies arising from an internet relationship program and you may marriages due to unfettered options. Interpersona: A global Journal to the Individual Relationships, 3, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S., & Accumulated snow, C. (2004, May). Permitting american singles enter best marriage ceremonies playing with predictive varieties of marital victory. Paper displayed on 16th Yearly Summit of the American Psychological People. [ Backlinks ]
Approach and you may program for identifying people who find themselves probably keeps a flourishing relationship
C). How does personality matter when you look at the ination of feature kissbrides.com bra webbplats anxiety, negativity, and you can relationship pleasure. Journal out of Character and you can Societal Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Website links ]
Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Ramifications away from relationships form of to have understanding compatibility. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible relationship (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in relationship aspiration and you may fulfillment which have pc-create couples. Diary of ily, twenty eight, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, An excellent., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love on the internet: Skills online interest. Log away from Sex Degree and you may Procedures, twenty two, 7-fourteen. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do somebody understand what they require: An identical otherwise subservient companion? Evolutionary Therapy, six, 595-602. [ Website links ]
Feingold, Good. (1988). Coordinating to have elegance inside romantic lovers and you can exact same-sex family relations: Good meta-research and you can theoretical feedback. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Off popular with appalling: Disenchantment which have an intimate spouse. Sociological Perspectives, forty two, 263-280. [ Website links ]