3. Efficiency
Distribution in age group, education, occupation, number of family members in a household, household generation type, marital status, physical activity, and smoking status significantly differed by sex ( p value < 0.05)>
Patterns of eating alone significantly differed by age group, education, income status, occupation, number of family members, household generation type, and marital status in men (all p values < 0.05).>
In men, no significant difference was found except for energy intake. Men who had breakfast alone reported higher energy intakes compared to those who reported never eating alone, lunch alone, dinner alone, or lunch and dinner alone (all p values < 0.05).>
Men exactly who ate restaurants alone or food and you will food alone compared with people who consumed with individuals had a considerably greater risk away from MetS (adjusted opportunity ratios (AOR) 1.51, 95% count on intervals (CI) step 1.06–2.16; AOR step 1.54, 95% CI step one.05–2.twenty-five, respectively). Ladies who had breakfast by yourself compared with people that consumed having other people had a considerably lower likelihood of MetS (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53–0.94). Getting intestinal being obese, men that has supper and you may eating by yourself, morning meal and you can dining alone, otherwise morning meal, dinner, and food alone every had a significantly higher risk regarding abdominal being obese (AOR 2.01, 95% CI step 1.27–step 3.20; AOR step 1.fifty, 95% CI 1.00–2.25; AOR 1.sixty, 95% CI step 1.01–dos.51, respectively) compared to people that consumed with people. Zero tall relationship is actually discovered anywhere between designs away from restaurants alone and you may the risk of intestinal obesity in females. Czytaj więcej