getbride.org da+tyske-kvinder-vs-amerikanske-kvinder postordre brud rigtigt sted

Like, desire, while the inhibition out of view out of romantic choice

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. Bliv pГҐ hjemmesiden C. (2008). Progression and you may Human Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place of attachment in the individual mating. Report about General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Record regarding Social Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal tech one minimizes personal wedding and you can mental well-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.M., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, time, and time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent Society Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study regarding intimacy, interests, and you can commitment: Testing the fresh new assumptions of one’s triangular principle out of like. Mental Account, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impression most readily useful from the doing bad: Social comparisons inside intimate dating. Log away from Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. Czytaj więcej